The same review, tuned to your situation.

For engineering teams who want to ship fast without compliance becoming a quarterly emergency. Catch control-relevant changes in the review you already do.

For security engineers who cannot personally review every change against every obligation. A framework-grounded second set of eyes on the diff.

For EU SaaS teams carrying overlapping regulatory duties. The data-protection and resilience obligations that show up in a diff, named at the clause.

For startups heading into a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001. Get the framework awareness of a larger company without hiring for it.

For fintech and payments teams whose regulators moved into the repository: card-data handling, operational resilience, and vendor risk all change one diff at a time.

For healthtech teams handling patient data. HIPAA's technical safeguards and GDPR's data duties show up in ordinary changes: a log line, a storage config, a dropped check.

For AI-native startups facing the EU AI Act's engineering duties (logging, data governance) alongside the SOC 2 and GDPR asks every customer already makes.

For engineering teams where Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, or Codex open a growing share of pull requests. The compliance reading has to keep pace with the code, not with how many people you have to read it.

For US SaaS teams whose customers ask for SOC 2, HIPAA, NIST, CMMC, or CCPA. The controls that actually show up in a diff, named at the clause.

Compliance review on the pull request, for maintainers who keep the repository public. No application. No license check.